BUCHAREST, ROMANIA: Andrew Tate, the highly controversial social media influencer, has once again sparked a heated debate, this time on the platform 'X.'
His latest assertion revolves around the notion that a man cannot be labeled a misogynist solely based on desiring the love of a loyal woman.
Tate has built a significant following through his consistent engagement with his audience, particularly targeting men.
Over time, he has become known for his outspoken ideas on masculinity and frequently imparts his perspective on what it means to be a man in the modern world.
However, Andrew Tate's ideology on this matter recently faced criticism from an academic researcher who labeled him as a "disaster."
Andrew Tate asserts a man cannot be a misogynist to desire a 'loyal' woman
In a recent social media post shared on platform 'X', Tate expressed a viewpoint that has stirred both agreement and controversy among his followers and critics alike.
Tate asserted that a man harboring a desire for a kind, loving, and loyal woman who genuinely adores him, does not make him a misogynist.
This statement has ignited discussions about the distinction between personal preferences and the broader societal issues of misogyny and gender discrimination.
Tate wrote, "You’re not a mysogonist [sic] to want a kind loving and loyal woman who adores you."
Andrew Tate's fans say he is correct
After Tate's statement that a man cannot be labeled misogynistic for desiring a kind-hearted woman, numerous users stepped forward to share their perspectives on his assertion.
One user wrote, "You are correct. That is what we should want. Loyalty also comes in many forms." Another user wrote, "Top G spitting."
A user stated, "I'm not going to take advice from someone who can't spell misogynist." A user commented, "Nope your being a responsible looking towards the future for your family success."
Another user commented, "True. Desiring genuine love and loyalty isn't misogyny. It's human. Every person deserves respect and affection. The narrative needs a shift from labels to understanding core values."